Pengaruh Jarḥ Wa Ta‘Dīl Terhadap Kekuatan Hukum Hadis
Keywords:
Jarḥ Wa Ta‘Dīl, Hukum, HadisAbstract
The hadith of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the second source of Islamic law after the Qur'an, which plays a central role in establishing Islamic teachings and laws. However, differences in the quality of narration require a scientific method to ensure the authenticity of hadith before it can be used as a sharia shari'ah argument. This article aims to analyze the concept and mechanism of jarḥ wa ta'dīl in assessing the quality of narrators and hadith, the influence of the results of jarḥ wa ta'dīl on the classification of hadith and its level of acceptance as sharia shari'ah argument, and its implications for the legal force of hadith in the istinbāṭ al-aḥkām process. This study uses a qualitative approach with a normative-descriptive library research method. Data were obtained from primary and secondary literature in the fields of hadith science and usul fiqh, then analyzed using content analysis and comparative techniques. The results of this study indicate that jarḥ wa ta‘dīl is the main methodological foundation in determining the validity of hadith through assessing the moral integrity (‘adālah) and intellectual rigor (ḍabṭ) of the narrator. This finding confirms that the results of jarḥ wa ta‘dīl directly influence the classification of hadith—ṣaḥīḥ, ḥasan, and ḍa‘īf—and determine its legal force as a source of Islamic law. In the contemporary context, the urgency of jarḥ wa ta‘dīl is increasing along with the massive dissemination of hadith through digital media, so that scientific verification is a necessity to maintain the validity of Islamic teachings.
References
Anshori, M. (2016). KAJIAN KETERSAMBUNGAN SANAD (ITTIŞĀL AL-SANAD). JURNAL LIVING HADIS, 1(2).
Andaluzi, F., Millah, M., & Alif, M. (2024). KEḤUJJAHAN HADIS ĀḤĀD DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP NĀSIKH MANSŪKH. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 23(2), 442-473.
Ansory, Isnan., D. (2025). Kontribusi Imam Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal (164-241 H) dalam Pengembangan Metodologi Kritik Hadis: Analisis Sanad, Matan, dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Tradisi Keilmuan Sunni. Dirasat: Journal Islamic Studies, 2(2). dirasat: Journal Islamic Studies
Farhan, R. L. (2022). Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Urgensi Ilmu Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl dalam Menilai Kualitas Hadis. Journal of Hadith Studies, 5(1), 27-36.
Fauziah, C. (2018). I ‘Tibār Sanad Dalam Hadis. Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 1(1), 123-142.
Faridi, F., Setiadi, A., Reftiyani, A., Ridwan, A. F., & Andi, A. (2024). KRITIK ULAMA HADIS KONTEMPORER TERHADAP HADIS-HADIS TANPA STATUS DI DALAM RIYÄ€ ḠŒ AL-á¹¢ Ä€ LIḤ ĪN. Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara, 6(1), 53-66.
Imron, A. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Jarh Wa Ta ’ dil. MUKADDIMAH: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(2), 287–302.
Nico Akbar, Ali, M. (2025). HADIS SAHIH, HASAN, DAIF DAN MAUDU’. MA’HAD ALY JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES, 4, 58–85.
Pink, J. (2022). Susan Gunasti, The Qur’an between the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic: An Exegetical Tradition. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 24(3), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2022.0520
Shauma Raffi’u, Aliyya., dkk. (2023). ILMU JARḤ WA TA’DīL: Kajian Sejarah dan Urgensinya di Era Kontemporer. Muẚṣarah: Jurnal Kajian Islam Kontemporer, 5(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.18592/msr.v5i1.8586
Tasbih, M., & Abdullah, Z. (2025). Kajian Kritis Terhadap Kriteria Al-Jarh Dan Al-Ta'dil Dalam Manhaj Ulama Hadis Klasik. El-Mizzi: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(1), 1-22.
Tasbih, M., & Abdullah, Z. (2026). Kajian Metodologi Kritik Sanad dalam Tradisi Ilmu Hadis. Al-Iftah: Jurnal Tafsir Al-Qur'an dan Hadist, 2(1), 1-10.






