Multishape Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Era 5.0: Ragam Model dan Integrasi Teknologi Human-Centric
Keywords:
distance learning, Society 5.0, human-centric technologyAbstract
This study addresses the gap between the rapid development of diverse (multishape) distance learning models and the implementation of human-centric technology principles in the Society 5.0 era, which often results in technically driven yet psychologically isolating learning experiences. The research question guiding this study is: How can the multishape configuration of distance learning be integrated with human-centric technology principles to create effective and student-centered learning? Employing a systematic literature review method, data were collected from primary sources in the Google Scholar, Garuda, and Sinta databases (publications 2015–2025) and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The findings reveal three main outcomes: (1) the evolution of multishape models (synchronous, asynchronous, blended, flipped) supported by specific platforms; (2) the core convergence of human-centric principles—personalization, meaningful interaction, and well-being—with educational technology; and (3) a practical integrative framework for synergizing model diversity with technology through smart blending and empathetic pedagogy. The study concludes that successful distance learning in the 5.0 era hinges on designing flexible, human-centered ecosystems rather than relying on single tools or models.
References
Almazroa, H., & Alotaibi, W. (2023). Immersive Learning with Augmented Reality: A Case Study in Science Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2), 456-478.
Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-Learning Critical Success Factors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(9), 667-675.
Anugrahana, A. (2020). Hambatan, Solusi, dan Harapan: Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 10(3), 287-298.
Arianto, F., Bachri, B. S., & Mariono, A. (2022). Asynchronous dan Synchronous Learning pada Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (JIME), 8(4), 1–10.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2017). Flipped Learning: Gateway to Student Engagement. International Society for Technology in Education.
Bernard, R. M., et al. (2015). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(2), 87-122
Chai, C. S., et al. (2019). Surveying and Modelling Singapore Pre-service Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 378-393.
Dewi, N., et al. (2020). Tantangan Motivasi dan Interaksi dalam Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(2), 56-65.
Dewi, N., et al. (2020). Tantangan Motivasi dan Interaksi dalam Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(2), 56-65.
Faishol, R. (2022). Teacher Presence dalam Pembelajaran Daring: Studi Kasus di IAI Ibrahimy Genteng Banyuwangi. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 13(2), 123-138.
Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-Centered Society. Japan Spotlight, 27, 47-50.
Graham, C. R. (2019). Current Research in Blended Learning. In Handbook of Distance Education (4th ed., pp. 173-188). Routledge.
Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 38.
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising Learning Analytics to Support Study Success in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1961–1990.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K–12 education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 24–36.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-242.
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76-78.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2015). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Purwanto, A., et al. (2021). Teacher’s Readiness in Conducting Distance Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 771-788.
Rafiq, M., et al. (2020). University Students' Acceptance of Learning Management System for Blended Learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 18(1), 42-54.
Rifanisari, R. (2021). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Berbasis Internet: Tantangan dan Solusi di Era New Normal. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(1), 66-74.
Salsabila, A., & ... (2021). Inovasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Digital Menuju Society 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 130-138.
Salsabila, A., et al. (2021). Inovasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Digital Menuju Society 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 130-138.
Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306.
Syahid, A. (2023). Efektivitas Blended Learning Berbasis WhatsApp dan Google Classroom di IAI Ibrahimy. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Al-Ibrah, 8(1), 45-60.
Yuangga, K., & Sunarsi, D. (2020). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Era Digital. Jurnal Ilmiah Edutic, 7(1), 53-62.
Yuangga, K., & Sunarsi, D. (2020). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Era Digital. Jurnal Ilmiah Edutic, 7(1), 53-62.
Yunita, R., & Kismartini. (2020). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(3), 309-318.
